Cameron & Osborne step into the planning breach.

Just days after our last update on the planning situation Prime Minister Cameron steps forward to introduce clarity where once there was dithering..…..

With Mr Osborne, who is the Conservative Party’s chief election strategist, further reforms to planning rules are proposed to promote growth in the economy.  The new legislation is expected to provide for less time for appeals by limiting local residents’ abilities to appeal and, most controversially, to allow council to authorise building on the green belt, by redesignating other areas, thereby providing more land in the previously sacrosanct green belt for new build projects.  With sparkling insight, Mr Osborne has indicated that he would like a planning system similar to that in China, where industrial pollution, degradation of the countryside and an appalling health and safety record are the watchword.

These reforms form part of the Government’s financial package of £40 billion to aid and promote growth.

House builders in the UK currently hold in excess of 200,000 plots for development with planning permission.  Why are these not being built on?  Could it be anything to do with the lack of availability of mortgages and funding?  I wonder.  Rather than meddle with planning reforms that have barely had a chance to bed in and start to take effect, perhaps Mr Osborne could sit down at Gregg’s with some of his banking friends and ask if they would be kind enough to let the UK taxpayer have some of the money the Government provided for bonuses to allow house building to get moving.

Just a thought.  

Planning Review - All Change?

In March this year we posted on the new National Planning Policy Framework and the likely impact it would have on the process for new development in the UK.

The Department for Communities and Local Government issued their Impact Assessment yesterday, which at 79 pages is longer by a margin than the Framework document itself.  Amongst much else, the Impact Assessment contains some fascinating insight into the projected costs of the consolidation of the planning processes proposed in the NPPF and by whom these are to be borne!  Read the full document here:

http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/2172846.pdf

Three months on and the jury is still out.  Lining up in one corner of the green field is the “pro development” lobby and, currently, they would appear to be reassured by the legislation, in that there is a presumption in favour of sustainable development.  In essence, if a proposed development is well located, with good public transport links and connection to the town center, is of a high quality design and the construction materials can be proven to be sustainable then all should bode well.

In the opposite corner are those who, let’s not say they are “anti development” but are most concerned for the future of our green and pleasant land and they too are feeling encouraged.  Leading the charge are Friends of the Earth and the National Trust who, with many others have heard the Government state that the green belt is sacrosanct and that the natural heritage of the nation needs to be defended for future generations.

So, peace and love abounds with both sides feeling satisfied that their concerns have been listened to and addressed, at least in part.  However, as the expression goes, “something’s got to give”.

I think we can look forward to the detail of applications that come under opposition fire being thrashed out in the courts of the land, over many hours and at much cost.  The much heralded, new and slimmed down, planning framework may be about to get a lot fatter as each challenge is mounted. 

Anyone for a Judicial Review?

Planning to Fail - Failing to Plan?:

In March this year we posted on the new National Planning Policy Framework and the likely impact it would have on the process for new development in the UK.

The Department for Communities and Local Government issued their Impact Assessment yesterday, which at 79 pages is longer by a margin than the Framework document itself.  Amongst much else, the Impact Assessment contains some fascinating insight into the projected costs of the consolidation of the planning processes proposed in the NPPF and by whom these are to be borne!  Read the full document here:

http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/2172846.pdf

Three months on and the jury is still out.  Lining up in one corner of the green field is the “pro development” lobby and, currently, they would appear to be reassured by the legislation, in that there is a presumption in favour of sustainable development.  In essence, if a proposed development is well located, with good public transport links and connection to the town center, is of a high quality design and the construction materials can be proven to be sustainable then all should bode well.

In the opposite corner are those who, let’s not say they are “anti development” but are most concerned for the future of our green and pleasant land and they too are feeling encouraged.  Leading the charge are Friends of the Earth and the National Trust who, with many others have heard the Government state that the green belt is sacrosanct and that the natural heritage of the nation needs to be defended for future generations.

So, peace and love abounds with both sides feeling satisfied that their concerns have been listened to and addressed, at least in part.  However, as the expression goes, “something’s got to give”.

I think we can look forward to the detail of applications that come under opposition fire being thrashed out in the courts of the land, over many hours and at much cost.  The much heralded, new and slimmed down, planning framework may be about to get a lot fatter as each challenge is mounted. 

Anyone for a Judicial Review?

Time to review and reassess?

James Alexander Consultants are helping bring clarity to the challenges the asset portfolio’s of their clients bring.  Determining the relevance your owned or leased assets has to your business and its long term effect is fundamental to ensuring you have the correct profile in place.  Planning and managing the utilisation of those assets and their place in your business is our speciality.

James Alexander Consultants are expert in assessing your portfolio and, with you, determining a strategy to develop the correct balance of assets, their relevance and performance for you.  We develop, plan and implement the strategy, leaving you to focus on core activity and opportunity.

Our focus is to maximise the opportunity your built and land assets brings to your business whilst minimising the liabilities.  Get in touch with us to see how we can help you address lease related problems, acquisitions or disposals and help bring your portfolio into line for your business needs.

eMail us on innovation@jaltd.co.uk or see our contact page for our numbers.  We look forward to speaking with you.

P is for...

Planning & Strategy:

Occupying business premises is no laughing matter.  The costs involved can be significant and the penalties, should you get it wrong, can be severe.

Having said that, the opportunity for it to go well is significant!  Like all property transactions in the UK (well England and Wales anyway!) the pace of movement is usually somewhere akin to that of the proverbial snail.  Lease break clauses do (should) not usually sneak up on you, they are telegraphed well ahead of time (when the lease is signed?).  So the opportunities for you to plan aspects of your estates strategy are easily able to be recognised and addressed.  However, that is not the whole picture.  Not all elements are so easily planned.  As we have said many times before, the real estate only exists to support your core activity, it’s there to help you to produce your widgets or build your social media empire or whatever.

And (yes, you can start a sentence with and) that’s where the challenge comes.

Planning a strategy to match your real estate occupancy to your business’s operational requirements is not too difficult in principle, but will throw up some very challenging questions to you and your colleagues.  I was with a client recently and the discussion revolved around the business’s requirement to relocate to larger operating premises, the availability, or lack of, suitable prospects in the locality and the impact a more significant geographical move to achieve the right accommodation could have on the business in terms of the potential for the loss of key staff.  An interesting conundrum and one that the jury is still out on.

Size, location, mix, usage and cost will all play a part in developing a coherent strategy for real estate and the activity should be undertaken with the same thoroughness that is applied to the operational aspects of the business.

James Alexander Consultants can help you find your way through to the best solution to your accommodation needs.

eMail us on innovation@jaltd.co.uk or see our contact page for our numbers.  We look forward to speaking with you.

G is for...

Growth:

A few brief thoughts today on how your real estate supports your organisation in times of growth.

The key word in the previous sentence is the word support.  It was once commented that a £100,000 building will house £1,000,000 worth of equipment that will produce £100,000,000 worth of product.  The message being, that without the £100,000 shed the production is not going to happen.  In themselves the built assets do not form part of the core activities of you r business, but without them, or with the wrong assets, the business is not going to function in the correct way.

So, where is your £100,000 shed?  Is it the right size & shape, is it adaptable and flexible for your needs and, most importantly is it going to keep up with the business development that you have planned?

Regular review and assessment of the facilities you occupy will help you determine whether this is the case:

• Can developing new working practices and work patterns help with your business growth?
• Can your site accommodate new temporary buildings to address immediate requirements for additional accommodation?
• Do lease restrictions mean that your current facility will not, over time, be suitable for your purposes and is now the right time to plan to move?
• Will new compliance regulations in your business or industry mean that refurbishment is required?  Will this prove to be prohibitively expensive in the current location?

 You will be aware that property related transactions do not move too quickly and, sometimes, not too smoothly either.  Planning well ahead for your businesses operational real estate requirements will be key in achieving success.

James Alexander Consultants are expert in assessing your portfolio and, with you, determining a strategy to develop the correct balance of assets, their relevance and performance for you.  We develop, plan and implement the strategy, leaving you to focus on core activity and opportunity.

eMail us on innovation@jaltd.co.uk or see our contact page for our numbers.  We look forward to speaking with you.

D Day for Planning

Today’s the day.  The new National Planning policy framework will be announced by Ministers at lunchtime.  Following a much criticised consultation process with developers, environmental groups and other during last year, the new framework will come into force immediately.

Opponents of the change are badging the reforms as a “developers’ charter” whilst the Government are confident that reforms will simplify the existing complex and confusing system and help boost growth. 

One of the key points of contention is the definition of what is meant by the phrase “sustainable development”.  Speaking on BBC Radio 4 this morning Planning Minister Greg Clark explained that sustainable development meant that  "If there are reasons, for example if it destroys the environment, if it builds on the green belt, if it builds outside a town centre if it's a commercial premises when you want to keep town centres thriving, then that would not be sustainable, it would not be in the public interest and so it should not go ahead."  The framework also indicates that the default answer for development proposals should be yes, and this is where the nub of the matter lies.

To date the planning process has proved to have been a rather inaccessible matter for most people to engage with.  Part of the objective of the new framework has been to simplify and make the process more accessible.  1,300 pages down to 50, quite a change. There is a perception that this slimming down of the “rules” will allow developers to ride roughshod over local wishes and turn swathes of the greenbelt into housing estates.  Government has given assurances that this is not the case.  However, vocal opponents including the National Trust, the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) and Friends of the Earth believe this is exactly what will happen and our green and pleasant land will be no more.

Currently 11% of the area of the UK is developed.  It will be an interesting watch to see what transpires from this new framework.

Review Time

James Alexander Consultants are helping bring clarity to the challenges the asset portfolio’s of their clients bring.  Determining the relevance your owned or leased assets has to your business and its long term effect is fundamental to ensuring you have the correct profile in place.  Planning and managing the utilisation of those assets and their place in your business is our speciality.

James Alexander Consultants are expert in assessing your portfolio and, with you, determining a strategy to develop the correct balance of assets, their relevance and performance for you.  We develop, plan and implement the strategy, leaving you to focus on core activity and opportunity.

Our focus is to maximise the opportunity your built and land assets brings to your business whilst minimising the liabilities.  Get in touch with us to see how we can help you address lease related problems, acquisitions or disposals and help bring your portfolio into line for your business needs.

eMail us on innovation@jaltd.co.uk or see our contact page for our numbers.  We look forward to speaking with you.

Home Office?

Planning consents for the conversion of offices to residential buildings in the West End is on the increase.  Last year schemes totalling more that 2 million sq ft of conversion were granted, significantly up on the 202,000 sq ft in 2010.  Values of West End conversions are being quoted at the £3,000 per sq ft mark as against £2,000 per sq ft for office space and a number of office building are currently on the market to attract residential developers to drain even more for the pool of available commercial space.  It is thought the demand is, yet again in the London residential market, being driven by demand from “overseas buyers” with the kudos of Mayfair and St. James’s being too great an attraction to resist.

Westminster Council would appear to be keen on this latest trend, showing limited resistance to the movement to convert.  Indeed, new planning regulations may make it even easier to carry these out without the need for a change of use consent.  The trend will continue to put the squeeze on the West End commercial occupier, those creating and bringing wealth into the capital on a continuing basis.  Rental levels on refurbished space in Mayfair are already breaking the £100 per sq ft level and, with a narrowing range of choice as new developments hit an all time low, there will be continual upward pressure on the limited vacant space available.

This is all very well for the present as the Capital’s residential market continues to resist the national trend of stagnation and even regression in housing prices.  Where there’s a fast buck to be made, why not?  When the economy turns, (and it has to doesn’t it?) the time lag to address the requirement for more commercial accommodation will be significant. Apart from the obvious lack of acreage in the West End, and they’re not making any more of that, the timescales to prepare and develop either new build, conversions or refurbishment will mean that the shortage of available space will be with us for some time to come.

Not all is doom and gloom on this front, however.  There are those who welcome the return to original usage of some fine buildings, with period features once again being brought back to a life they were originally intended for.

Asset Strategy or Asset Lethargy?

James Alexander Consultants are helping bring clarity to the challenges the asset portfolio’s of their clients bring.  Determining the relevance your owned or leased assets has to your business and its long term effect is fundamental to ensuring you have the correct profile in place.  Planning and managing the utilisation of those assets and their place in your business is our speciality.

James Alexander Consultants are expert in assessing your portfolio and, with you, determining a strategy to develop the correct balance of assets, their relevance and performance for you.  We develop, plan and implement the strategy, leaving you to focus on core activity and opportunity.

Our focus is to maximise the opportunity your built and land assets brings to your business whilst minimising the liabilities.  Get in touch with us to see how we can help you address lease related problems, acquisitions or disposals and help bring your portfolio into line for your business needs.

eMail us on innovation@jaltd.co.uk or see our contact page for our numbers.  We look forward to speaking with you.